Five Conservative MPs Under Investigation for Interference in Wheat Board Elections

The RCMP confirmed this month that it is investigating a complaint filed by the National Farmers’ Union against five Conservative MPs for violating the rules governing elections to the Canadian Wheat Board’s board of directors.  The CWB board is comprised of 10 elected farmers, who serve four-year-terms, and five government appointees.  Elections are held every two years in five of the voting districts.

The five government MPs – four in Saskatchewan and one in Alberta – mailed out letters in three of the five electoral districts urging voters to support candidates in favour of getting rid of the CWB system of collective marketing.

One of the MPs being investigated, David Anderson, is also the Parliamentary Secretary for the CWB.  The letters were mailed out in late November (the elections ended the first week of December) on House of Commons letterhead and were funded by each MP’s constituency budget.  The Speaker of the House of Commons has already ruled that mailing out these letters was not an abuse of parliamentary privilege, although opposition MPs pointed out it was akin to MPs mailing letters to their constituents instructing them how to vote in civic or community organization elections.  The letter sent by David Anderson, for example, states “I am very pleased to have a strong proponent for marketing choice running right here in District 4.  Sam Magnus … has a proven record in mediation and was seen as instrumental in brokering the merger between the Canadian Alliance and the Progressive Conservative parties.  … Together, we can bring marketing choice to Western Canada.  Time is running out, vote for Sam …”

The NFU has asked the RCMP to investigate whether the five MPs got access to the CWB voter lists, which are provided only to the candidates in each district for use during the election period and then must be returned or destroyed. 

Some of the MPs, including David Anderson, have claimed that they didn’t use the official voter list but rather used lists they had pulled together in their own constituencies over the years.  However, as Saskatchewan farm columnist Paul Beingessner (himself a pro-collective marketing candidate in District 8) pointed out, this claim borders on the absurd:

“Thus, the mystery. Where did Dave get a list of names that so exactly matches the names on the confidential voters list? Well, says Dave, I have a lot of lists. I've been collecting lists for twenty years.

“And what remarkable lists they must be. Lists of farmers. Lists of their wives. Lists of farm companies. Lists even of numbered companies, just as they appear on the voters list. (Companies can have permit books, and hence are entitled to a ballot in director elections.)

“Nor are Dave's lists in any way stale. With a prescience bordering on clairvoyance, David Anderson has lists of names that are found nowhere else but on the voters list. Names of companies, for example, that have only existed for a few months. Names of farmers that are used nowhere else but in permit books.  Dave has remarkable lists, but he doesn't have the voters list.” (Of Lying and List Making, Dec. 1, 2008)

 


Back to Modern Communism