Special Meeting of IAEA Board of Governors Passes Resolution Against Iran

The special meeting of the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), held in Vienna between February 2 and 4, 2006 approved a resolution to immediately report its decisions to the U.N. Security Council on what confidence-building measures it requires from Iran.  The resolution alleged that Iran has violated its obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and expressed an absence of confidence that Iran’s nuclear program is exclusively for peaceful purposes. The resolution also directs the IAEA to report to the Security Council on Iran’s implementation of these measures after the regular meeting of its board on March 6.

The resolution was approved by a vote of 27 in favour, 3 against, and 5 abstentions. The votes in favour of the resolution came from Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Britain, Canada, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Egypt, France, Germany, Ghana, Greece, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, Norway, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Sweden, United States and Yemen. The votes against the resolution were from Cuba, Venezuela and Syria, and the abstentions came from Algeria, Belarus, Indonesia, Libya and South Africa.

The resolution “deems it necessary for Iran” to implement five “confidence-building measures”:

* Re-establish full and sustained suspension of all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities, including research and development;

* Reconsider the construction of a research reactor moderated by heavy water;

* Ratify promptly and implement in full the Additional Protocol;

* Pending ratification, continue to act in accordance with the provisions of the Additional Protocol; and

* Implement transparency measures…which extend beyond the formal requirements of the Safeguards Agreement and Additional Protocol, and include such access to individuals, documentation relating to procurement, dual use equipment, certain military-owned workshops and research and development.

On January 18, Britain, France and Germany (EU-3) requested the special meeting of the Board of Governors of the IAEA after Iran removed the seals from its Natanz uranium enrichment plant and resumed its nuclear fuel research. A resolution was drafted by the United States, Britain, France and Germany, and then approved by Russia and China at a meeting of foreign ministers in London on January 31. The resolution was formally submitted to the IAEA by Britain, France and Germany.

The resolution was the result of a compromise among the Big Five powers on the timing of any action by the Security Council. The United States and the EU-3 wanted the U.N. Security Council to take action to reinforce the decisions of the IAEA immediately following the special board meeting. China and Russia, however, would only agree to support the resolution if time was allowed to resolve the issue prior the next meeting of the IAEA board on March 6.  

The vote was planned for February 3, but was delayed until February 4. The delay arose from the attempts by some developing countries to revise the resolution and from counter efforts by the EU-3 to reach a compromise in order to avoid abstentions from these countries. The U.S. and EU-3, however, would not budge from the original text. Also, a dispute arose between the U.S. and Egypt over linking Israel and its nuclear weapons to nuclear concerns in the Middle East.  The United States did not want any mention of this in the resolution, while Egypt wanted it included to give some balance to the resolution. In the end, the resolution makes no mention of Israel’s nuclear weapons.

The Iranian government has stated that the allegations contained in the February 4 resolution of the Board of the Governors of the IAEA and in the preceding January 31 joint statement by the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China are false, violate the provisions of the NPT and the statutes of the IAEA, and are politically motivated.


Back to Modern Communism