Film Review
When the Past
Lives in the Present: Amu Screened in
Following its
Canadian premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival in the fall of
2005, Amu, by filmmaker Shonali
Bose, opened in
Kaju (Konkana Sensharma)
is an Indian-American, struggling with the same issues of identity and
belonging with which many first generation youth grapple
with. Visiting her family in
When her
adoptive mother Keya (Brinda Karat) arrives in
The flashback scenes to the massacres and riots are powerful - not because Bose uses gratuitous violence to convey the terror but because she takes the opposite approach and instead, while using light and sound to represent the mayhem, leaves its specificity to the imagination of the viewer. Not only does Bose convey the terror and chaos, she also depicts the bravery of the ordinary people who refused to be complicit in the massacres and helped hide Sikhs.
Through their research, Kabir’s father emerges as one of the forces behind the 1984 crimes. Interestingly, though, as a filmmaker Bose rejects the convenience of creating a “bad guy” on whom the atrocities can be pinned. It is not Kabir’s father – it is the entire Indian state, rotten to its core, which bears responsibility for the crimes of 1984. In one scene, Kabir and Kaju meet with a group of widows whose families were killed during the massacres. One of the widows tells Kaju that the riots were organized by a government Minister. They were all involved, says another in the group, the police, the politicians, the bureaucrats – all of them. The Indian censor board, which delayed the Indian release of Amu by three months, ordered these two lines of dialogue be dubbed over (Bose refused and instead the dialogue was removed from the version released in India, with only the women’s lips moving). Even with the edit, the film was given the equivalent of an NC-17 rating, which meant that youth couldn't attend the film officially, although it has ended up being very popular with Indian youth. A censorship board official justified Amu's rating by stating “Why should young people know a history which is best buried and forgotten?”
But of course
history can neither be buried nor forgotten. As Kaju
faces the terrible reality of her past, Bose is able to depict both the horror
of 1984 and the continuing tragedy of the failure to hold the state accountable
for its crimes. In one of the final scenes of the movie, in present
day