Editorial

Commemorating Two Great Revolutionaries

This issue includes reports on meetings held recently in Winnipeg to commemorate two great revolutionaries of the twentieth century – Shaheed Bhagat Singh and Ché Guevara. Both participated in the anti-colonial, anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist struggles - Shaheed Bhagat Singh in India against British imperialism and Ché Cuevara in Latin America and Africa against U.S. imperialism - and both became martyrs to that cause. Both have also inspired successive generations of young people to take up the cause of revolution and socialism.

To a large extent, both Bhagat Singh and Ché have also transcended narrow ideological considerations that are often embraced or laid claim to by many of the sometimes-antagonistic ideo-political tendencies that exist within the revolutionary working class movement. This is as it should be. A revolutionary should be recognized as such by his/her deeds rather than by the ideology espoused or organizational affiliations.

For example, few know the specific ideology or political affiliations of the martyrs of the Paris Commune and fewer care. Marx and Engels argued against initiating that revolutionary uprising because conditions did not exist for it to succeed. However, once the battle had begun they gave it their unconditional support and when it was crushed they summed it up and drew the appropriate lessons, both positive and negative.

There are, of course, those who still refuse to accept Bhagat Singh and/or Ché as “genuine” revolutionaries because of their supposed lack of ideological purity. Such individuals are mistaken in their insistence that ideas are more important than reality. This is the mark of philosophical idealism.

In this era of imperialism and proletarian revolution, a revolutionary is someone who devotes his/her life to the overthrow of capitalism and imperialism and the establishment of the rule of the working class – socialism. That is all that matters. There are not a few individuals who claim to stand for socialism but who oppose the revolutionary overthrow of the capitalist system. There are others who wish to eliminate imperialism without eliminating its material base – capitalism; and others still who think that capitalism can be eliminated without the overthrow of the imperialist system. Bhagat Singh and Ché Guevara were not of that ilk. Whatever weaknesses may have existed in their ideological or political analysis of specific issues and whatever their choice of tactics, both clearly identified the enemy – capitalism and imperialism - and both called on revolutionaries to put aside their difference and unite in action against these enemies of humankind. This is why their legacy has spanned generations while many other “super” revolutionaries have become footnotes in history.   


Back to Modern Communism