Editorial

The CLC Convention and the Crisis of the Trade Union Movement

The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) held its 25th Constitutional Convention from May 26 to 30 in Toronto. The CLC is the largest trade union central in Canada, with approximately 3.2 million members.

Among the issues discussed at the convention was the steady decline in trade union density over the past two decades. Between 1988 and 2007 the overall percentage of the working class organized into trade unions in Canada fell from 39.5 percent to 31.5 percent. In the private sector, union density declined from 21.3 percent to 18.7 percent between 1997 and 2007. While the decline in Canada is not as drastic as that in the U.S., where union membership is hovering around 12 percent, many Canadian unions, particularly those with large memberships in the industrial centres of Ontario and Quebec, are suffering huge declines in membership.

The policy papers presented to the convention delegates for discussion addressed the issue of declining union density and the loss of industrial jobs by calling for various measures. First, it is urging its member unions to take up the task of organizing the unorganized, but this has been a constant refrain of the CLC for decades and little has been done to put it into effect. Instead, most unions have contented themselves with merging with or raiding other unions, which is much easier and cheaper than actually organizing the unorganized. The CLC is also calling for  government intervention to stop the decline in the manufacturing sector, an end to free trade deals and so on. These have also been perennial demands of the CLC, but its voice has been largely ignored by governments at all levels for many years, especially since the smashing of the “social contract” in the late-1990s, first by the Harris government of Ontario and subsequently by virtually every other provincial government across Canada.

The so-called “social contract” is a polite term for the Liberal-Labour alliance which emerged during the immediate post-war period in Canada. The Liberal-Labour alliance began with a truce between the Communist Party of Canada (CPC) and the Liberal government of Mackenzie King during and immediately after the Second World War, which saw the CPC drop its revolutionary program in exchange for legal recognition. However, despite this truce, in the late 1940s the Canadian state adopted McCarthyite Cold War policies and forged an alliance with the social democrats of the Canadian Commonwealth Federation (CCF) to destroy the influence of the Communist Party amongst Canadian workers. The Communist Party had been instrumental in organizing some of the most powerful industrial unions in Canada, including the United Auto Workers (UAW) and the International Woodworkers of America (IWA) and played a major role in leading the Canadian Congress of Labour (CCL). With the support of the CCF and its activists within the labour movement, the Canadian state was able to purge the communists from all leading positions within the CCL by 1950. Those unions which refused to purge the communists, such as United Electrical and Mine Mill, were expelled from the CCL. The CCL merged with the Trades and Labour Congress (TLC) in 1956 to form the Canadian Labour Congress, whose constitution specifically forbade the election of any communist to any level of leadership in any member trade union.

The elimination of the communists from the leadership of most of the trade unions and the de facto elimination of a revolutionary alternative within the broader working class movement with the adoption by the Communist Party (renamed the Labour Progressive Party) of its program of “the peaceful and parliamentary road to socialism” paved the way for what has become known as the “social contract” between the Canadian state and the trade union movement. In exchange for legal recognition by the Canadian state and certain reforms like collective bargaining and an automatic dues check-off, the main trade unions in Canada swore allegiance to the capitalist system and the capitalist state.

Apologists for the social-democratic trade union leaders refer to this “social contract” in glowing terms, as a great victory of the working class, the result of the bloodshed and heroic sacrifices of the working class and its allies to defeat fascism and build the trade union movement. Nothing could be further from the truth. The “social contract” represented the subjugation of the mission of the working class to the agenda of monopoly capital and the tying of the trade union movement to the coattails of monopoly capitalism and U.S. imperialism.

The current crisis of the trade union movement in Canada is a direct result of the anti-communist, pro-capitalist “social contract” forged between the main trade union leadership and the Canadian state in the 1940s and 1950s. It is a crisis which cannot be overcome either through organizing the unorganized or by convincing governments to subsidize various sectors of the Canadian economy to “save jobs”. The proof of this is that a virtually identical crisis exists in many countries with much higher union densities and government subsidies for manufacturing, such as most European countries. This is because the crisis of the trade union movement, in essence, has nothing to do with the declining number of members. This is a symptom of the crisis and not the cause.

The real crisis of the trade union movement is a crisis of confidence and a crisis of credibility. For decades the trade unions promised the working class that the unions could tame capitalism and make it serve both the owners and workers. Since the economic crisis of the early 1990s, that promise has been proven to be patently false. Furthermore, because the social-democratic trade unions quite adamantly reject any alternative to capitalism, they are now totally unable to offer any way out for workers. In fact, they are not even looking for a way out, but rather for a way back in for the trade union leaders and the labour aristocracy, for a new “social contract” based on an even deeper integration of the trade unions into the Canadian state. The CAW-Magna deal is a blueprint for that new arrangement, in which the workers have no rights and the role of the union is to openly co-manage labour with the capitalists.

Those who insist on creating illusions about the real anti-worker content of the post-war “social contract” and about the willingness and/or ability of the social-democratic trade unions to establish a new “social contract” which favours the working class are doing a huge disservice to the working class movement in Canada. There can be no “social contract” between monopoly capital and labour which serves the interests of the working class; such a “social contract” can only serve the interests of monopoly capital. The only “social contract” that serves the interests of the working class is one between the working class and all other classes and sections of society which are negated by monopoly capital. Such a social contract would, of necessity, be based on the common interest to overthrow monopoly capital and usher in a democratic and socialist Canada. The CLC will never agree to such a social contract.

It will be many weeks or months before the CLC publishes the results of its deliberations from May 26 to 30. However, it is not necessary to read those documents to predict with confidence that this CLC convention will do nothing to alleviate the crisis of the Canadian trade union movement. On the contrary, that crisis will only deepen and broaden in the coming years, because it can only be overcome through the rejection of social democracy and its insistence on tying the working class hand and foot to monopoly capital. This crisis will only be resolved on the basis of the Canadian working class rejecting the CLC and building a new trade union movement based on class struggle against the capitalist system.


Back to Modern Communism